European tsunami sweeps Israel .. Where is the Arabs? | policy
The tone of European anger against Israel escalated in a week that observers described as a radical coup in the western positions of the continuous aggression on the Gaza Strip 20 months ago.
This week’s episode of the “Panorama Net” program dealt with these exciting European transformations, and sought to analyze its backgrounds and explain its connotations, amid urgent questions about the absence of an Arab position equivalent to this sudden Western change.
The leaders of France, Britain and Canada have issued a joint statement in which they threatened to take punitive measures against Israel, unless restrictions on humanitarian aid and stop the expansion of the war.
The tension escalated after a shooting incident from the occupation forces on a European diplomatic delegation in Jenin camp, which prompted several countries to summon Israeli ambassadors.
The Israeli Broadcasting Corporation soon described this escalation as a “diplomatic tsunami” threatening the collapse of the international site of Israel.
Sources confirmed to Al -Jazeera that 17 European countries decided to review partnership agreements with Israel, while 9 other countries rejected that proposal.
Poisonous positions
In this context, the British government decided to suspend the free trade agreement negotiations with Israel and impose sanctions on settlers involved in violations.
While French President Emmanuel Macron described the situation in Gaza as a “human drama” that cannot be accepted, pointing to the absence of water, medicine and safe corridors, the Norwegian Prime Minister alluded to possible sanctions that may include Israeli individuals or products coming from settlements.
The Spanish parliament was true to consider a proposal to ban arms trade with Israel, with the support of parties of various political stripes, as well as the Spanish government to exclude Israel from international cultural events, as happened with Russia after the war on Ukraine.
As for the Swedish Foreign Minister, the Israeli plans that exacerbate the conditions of civilians criticized, stressing that the world does not need more statements.
These positions prompted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to declare that Israel’s friends oppose famine in Gaza, claiming the government’s intention to enter aid.
Rejection
However, a report on the island revealed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which will distribute aid, and headed by a former American soldier who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and is known for his sympathy for Israel.
UN spokesman Stefan Dujarric refused the plan, saying that the organization does not need partners to divert its humanitarian work.
In light of this Western shift, analysts in the program asked about the Arab position, which remained trapped in denunciation and denunciation data without any practical steps.
Analyst Iyad Al -Qara considered that the Arab position has become a dependency on the American decision, as a result of political, security and economic accumulations, while the researcher stressed that Makki stressed the need to push the European Union to recognize the State of Palestine, and to transform positions from humanity to political.
Researchers called for investing the European circumstance and turning it into a compressive political path that restores the Palestinian issue to the interface of the international decision, while the controversy flared up in the communication sites, between tweeters who saw that these positions are merely an ash of ashes, and others described it as a historical transformation in the relationship with Israel.
