Human Rights of Human Rights – Dr. Abdullah bin Musa Al -Tayer

Dr. Abdullah bin Musa Al -Tayer

It constitutes 40 countries, or close to that, which is known as the liberal, democratic West, and it represents about a fifth of the number of member states of the United Nations, that minority imposes its understanding and standards of human rights on the entire world. Western narrative on individual freedoms and democratic values, confiscated by the ends of the views of countries, civilizations, religions and cultures that adopt different opinions on human dignity. The result is not just a clash with the principles and human nature that is estimated by a variety of global majority, but a wailing and a apology crying with the majority of the majority. In order to realize the case of the situation, we only have to know that Israel is within the minority system, and this shame alone is enough to veto the prevailing narration from its basis for those who wanted to do this and work for it.

Western domination on the issue of human rights has history and backgrounds, since the post -World War II era, these forces, led by the United States of America and Europe, have contributed to forming global institutions such as the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights reflected the priorities of that alliance and enabled it to impose its own understanding of civil and political freedoms on collective, social and economic rights in other places of the world. International multilateral institutions dominated by financing and the Western leadership, have worked to establish liberal standards in international law, from treaties to the state of the International Criminal Court, and this influence was received by the economic factor, as commercial deals, humanitarian and developmental assistance often require compliance with Western human rights standards, as evidenced by the conditions related to the loans of the International Monetary Fund, accepting its interventions in the affairs of internal states, or will be fate Maints collective or unilateral penalties.

On the other hand, the soft power of the liberal West through the media, academic circles and non -governmental organizations has established this domination of this domination; The global media, Hollywood, entertainment platforms, and organizations such as Amnesty International contributed to the globalization of this understanding of human rights, and rejecting non -other views as relative or authoritarian. This tyranny marginalizes, for example, the Islamic human rights covenants, which emphasize the duties and African concepts such as the philosophy of (Ubuntu), which gives priority to society.

Some and I of them see that our current era provides a favorable opportunity to present an interview that is not based on apologies, justification and defense, but rather on the basis of the peer that is hoarded by human and civilizational diversity of concepts worthy of taking into account not to cancel the existing system but rather to crowd it with an alternative or alternatives that are consistent with the breadth of this world and the diversity of its components. With this chance, the existing domination challenge is very difficult. Any novel that contradicts the popular human rights approach will face structural barriers in multilateral bodies, as the cassation of the Security Council suffocates those attempts in its cradle. Also, the dominance of knowledge production, from universities to the centers of thought, overwhelms the elaborate and emerging sounds. The scene of the replacement of the alternative is more complicated because many countries receive humanitarian and development assistance, and others that depend on economically and scientifically on industrialized countries, and there is a degree of cultural and geopolitical division between the countries of the south, which impedes the effectiveness of the maturity of a reserve discourse in the field of human rights.

The events of October 2023 AD, they stripped the liberal society, and revealed the clearer criteria in dealing with human rights, and before that the Russian -Ukrainian war did, and what helped in spread awareness and knowledge that technology and the media, especially social networks, provided transit platforms for geopolitical, intellectual and cultural borders, and allowed the majority and some western components to overcome Traditional gate guards, which showed sharp criticism of human rights violations in exchange for the silence of the sponsors of them. This limited penetration coincides with the innovation of those in charge of the liberal public discourse new methods to maintain the dominance of its narrative, including restricting the arrival of the critical content of the double standards in downloading human rights to reality.

The vital popular efforts that raise their voice high by objecting to the prevailing narrator, intellectuals, activists and balanced countries can develop a new human rights narrative based on local traditions across the global south, and dialogue, not confrontation, with sympathetic Western allies, to give legitimacy to different views in this regard. As for continuing apology and justification, it will only lead to more brutality of the liberal Western understanding of human rights.