Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox
Get our free Inside Washington email
In his testimony during Donald Trump’s hush money trial, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker outlined a “mutually beneficial” scheme to keep the supermarket tabloid loaded with stories boosting his election chances in 2016, while ensuring “negative” stories never saw the light of day.
As part of the arrangement, Mr Pecker would tip off Mr Trump’s then-personal attorney Michal Cohen to “negative” stories about then-candidate Trump – particularly those involving women, according to Mr Pecker.
The former American Media Inc CEO – now the trial’s first witness – joined Mr Cohen and Mr Trump during a now-infamous meeting in August 2015 at Trump Tower in Manhattan, where he was asked “what can I do and what could my magazines do to help the campaign,” he said on Tuesday.
“I said what I would do is I would run or publish positive stories about Mr Trump and publish negative stories about his opponents. And I said I would also – I would also be the eyes and ears,” he said. “If I hear anything negative about women selling stories, I would notify Michael Cohen, and he would be able to have them killed in the magazine, or not be published, or somebody would have to purchase them.”
Mr Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records to allegedly cover up reimbursements totalling $130,000 to his former attorney, who paid for the silence of adult film star Stormy Daniels to prevent the release of potentially politically damaging stories of Mr Trump’s affair in the weeks leading up to the 2016 presidential election.
Prosecutors are hoping Mr Pecker’s testimony detailing the nature of that so-called “catch and kill” scheme – though not illegal – will show Mr Trump’s intent in his efforts to keep bad press involving allegations of his affairs away from voters.
“In the presidential campaign, I was the person that thought there would be – a lot of women would come out to sell these stories,” Mr Pecker said. “Because Mr Trump was well known as the most eligible bachelor, dating the most beautiful women, and it was clear based on my past experiences that when someone is running for office like this, it is very common for these women to call up a magazine like the National Enquirer to try and sell their stories.”
Mr Pecker described the arrangement as a “mutual benefit.”
“It would help him and it would help me,” he said. “Writing positive stories about Mr Trump and covering the election, and writing negative stories about his opponents, is only going to increase newsstand sales of the National Enquirer. … For me that was my benefit, and then in publishing those types of stories, it was also going to benefit his campaign.”
When he was alerted to potentially damaging stories, Mr Cohen would “try to vet it himself, and then he would go to individual publications to make sure it wasn’t published and get it killed,” according to Mr Pecker.
This is a developing story
Source link
